Wednesday, January 1, 2020

The Third Secret of Fatima Revealed by the Words and Actions of The Blessed Virgin Mary


JMJ
Garabandal: The Third Secret of Fatima Revealed by the Words and Actions of The Blessed Virgin Mary



Even in the womb before Our Lord was born, He went to St. Elizabeth, as she carried St. John the Baptist in her womb, to commission him to be the voice crying out in the wilderness “prepare the way of the Lord.”  St. John spent his life announcing the coming of the Messias for the benefit of those of good will who awaited Him. In our days, in the early 21st century, I believe we can look back at the apparitions of Our Blessed Mother over the past 500 years and say that she has been fulfilling the role of St. John, preparing us for the second coming of Christ, not as a Babe in a manger, but as the Terrible Judge.  And yet, even in His role as Just Judge, He proves that His mercy still burns in His Sacred Heart by sending His Holy Mother to warn us of His coming. The historical events involved in Her apparitions are well known; however, I believe that the circumstances of the apparitions can be just as helpful in revealing Her purpose as the messages that She brings.  Some examples follow.

Mexico in 1531. Our Lady appeared to a baptised Juan Diego, under the appearance of an Indian woman with child on a hill where previously had stood a temple to a pagan god to whom the sacrifice of children was offered.  She asked to be called by a name that means she who crushes the serpent and she gave the Castilian roses and Her glorious image on the tilma during the octave of the Immaculate Conception.

La Salette in 1846. Our Lady weeping. The eclipse of the Church. Rome becoming the seat of Antichrist.

Lourdes, France in 1858.  In the same year that Darwin’s heretical book on evolution was published, Our Lady appeared in Lourdes to St. Bernadette to proclaim Herself The Immaculate Conception.  She did so in the middle of the town dump where the trash of the city was burnt. The only human creature conceived without original sin, the Summit of all creation, stood in the midst of the dump and offered us the choice of following Her Immaculate Heart or wallowing in the wickedness and mire of worldly philosophies. All in the same year that Darwin revealed his diabolical theory of evolution. Coincidence? No.

Fatima, Portugal in 1917.   The fruit of godless atheism being godless communism, how appropriate that the Blessed Virgin appeared in Fatima in the same year that the Communist Revolution was destroying Russia. The miracle of the sun coming within a month of the establishment of the Soviet Union. And what about the Miracle?  The sun falling from its place after spinning out of control and losing its natural appearance. Quae est ista quae progreditur quasi aurora consurgens, pulchra ut luna, electa ut sol, terribilis ut castrorum acies ordinata. Who is she that cometh forth as the morning rising, fair as the moon, bright as the sun, terrible as an army set in array? Is this not a symbol of our Holy Mother the Church as well as of Our Lady. The request for the consecration of Russia; the sun falling from the sky; the Church in eclipse; the rise of communism, which would soon spread throughout the world. In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph – what a great event that will be!

Our Lady of the Great Event, more commonly, but erroneously, known as Our Lady of Good Success

This title by which Our Lady describes Herself to Mother Mariana in Spanish is Nuestra Señora del Buen Suceso.  This is commonly, almost universally, mistranslated as Our Lady of Good Success. However, the Spanish word suceso does not mean success. It means an event, an occurrence. So the correct translation of Our Lady’s title is not Our Lady of Good Success but rather Our Lady of the Great Event/Occurrence. This is extremely significant. It refers to the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart! The culmination of all the events symbolised in the life of Mother Mariana is that when all seems to be lost, at that moment our Lady will intervene and the Church will be restored – the Triumph of Her Immaculate Heart – the Great Event! This is also the message of Our Lady of Fatima: In the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph!

The events in the life of Mother Mariana de Jesus Torres of the Conceptionist (!) sisters in the convent of the Immaculate Conception (!) in Quito are so unbelievably symbolic that if they had not occurred so long ago, one would think it was an allegory written by a Traditionalist Catholic in the 21st century. 

Our Lady repeatedly warns Mother Mariana that in the middle of the 20th century a horrible chastisement would befall the Church (cf. Her warning at La Salette and Fatima’s 3rd secret). She explains in some detail the things that the Church would suffer, saying that the Sacraments would be difficult to find, that there would be the lack of a shepherd to guide the flock, etc. In addition to the direct communication of these warnings in words, the events which Mother Mariana endured and witnessed are equally prophetic. The books I have read discuss the words but I believe the meaning of the sufferings is even stronger.

Mother Mariana wanted to live her Franciscan vocation by following perfectly the Rule of the Franciscans given by Pope Julian II. That is, she wanted to hold on to the traditions, and not innovate in any way, no matter how insignificant it may appear to be, just as Catholics who want to keep the Faith have always done.  There were many in the convent who did not want to follow the rule [keep the Faith] and they conspired to make false reports to the bishop which led to her being put into the convent prison. This worked due to the weakness of the prioress who knew it was wrong but passed on the calumnies anyway.  Eventually, all of the nuns who wanted to keep the rule were put into the prison, underground, and unable to assist at the Mass and Divine Office.  The convent is symbolic of the Church in the mid-20th century. It is taken over by rebellious people who don’t want to keep the rule and those who hold on to tradition are placed in an underground prison and denied access to the Sacraments. All of this was done at the command of weak prioress and a bad bishop.  The bishop’s soul was only saved by the sacrifices of Mother Mariana on his behalf.  This happens repeatedly; Mother Mariana and sometimes the other obedient nuns are thrown in prison, then they are released, only to be thrown back in again. 

Mother Mariana actually died more than once and came back after having been shown visions of the horrible times that would come upon the Church in the mid-20th century.  One thing she saw was the extinguishing of the sanctuary light in the convent chapel and nobody was able to re-ignite it.  Our Lady explains many meanings to Mariana but the most obvious to me is that the Blessed Sacrament, i.e. the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass would be all but abolished. It is even the same symbolism that Pope Pius XII used when he warned:

I am worried by the Blessed Virgin's messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. ... A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God ... In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them, like Mary Magdalene weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, “where have they taken Him?” -- Pope Pius XII, quoted by Msgr. Georges Roche (secretary to Eugene Cardinal Tisserant) in his book Pius XII Devant L'Histoire, pp. 52-53.

The other symbolism that Our Lady does describe of the sanctuary lamp going out is that the Church will be without a pope:

How this Church will suffer on that occasion the dark night of the lack of a prelate and father to watch over them with paternal love, gentleness, strength, discernment and prudence. Many priests will lose their spirit placing their souls in great danger.

So what does this have to do with Garabandal and Fatima?

 Garabandal: The Exclamation Point at the end of the Third Secret of Fatima

Sister Lucía of Fatima warned many years ago that the Church and the world would be in a state of “Diabolical Disorientation” and she was, of course, correct. Nowhere is this more clearly to be seen than in the atmosphere surrounding the apparitions at San Sebastian de Garabandal.  Sister Lucia also told us that the Blessed Virgin Mary wanted the third secret to be revealed by 1960 at the latest! Like the rest of Her requests, this was not followed either. We know Her requests were not followed as She wanted because the events She wanted to avoid all happened.  The first world war was followed by a bigger and worse war; Russia (aka the Soviet Union) has spread her errors all over the world; and on and on. Our Lady told us this would happen. She said that the consecration of Russia would be late, and because of that, the event would not be so spectacular as it would have been, just as the Miracle of the Sun on October 13th was not as great as it would have been, had the children not been allowed to go into the hands of the Masonic/Communist government, so the conversion of Russia will not be as soon nor as spectacular as it would have been had the Pope consecrated Russia. Is the blame then to fall on the Popes? NO. The blame falls upon those to whom Our Lady made the first request for prayer and penance – upon us.

1960.  So, the third part of the secret Our Lady gave to Lucia was not revealed by the Popes, or by Angelo Roncalli in 1960. So Our Blessed Lord, whose mercy is without bounds, gave us yet another warning. The message that was written by Lucia to be read no later than 1960 was explained BY THE ACTIONS OF OUR LADY WITH THE CHILDREN AT GARABANDAL! Let this be clearly understood. It is the reason for Our Lady’s appearance at Garabandal, literally just a few months after the deadline she had given for the third secret to be revealed. Her wishes, actually, those of Her Divine Son, were NOT obeyed. Did He and She turn their backs on us and leave us to our just desserts? NO. They told us the contents of the third secret of Fatima by dramatising them at GARABANDAL.  I will explain shortly. But first, I tell you now, the contents of the third secret are not in the future. THEY ARE FULFILLED AND MAYBE YOU DID NOT EVEN KNOW IT.

Many have heard of the prophecies of Daniel regarding the cessation of the continual Sacrifice; of the prophecies of Our Lady at La Salette regarding Rome becoming the seat of the Antichrist, of antipopes, and the rest and you have said to yourself, and rightly so, “How terrible will those times be!” and “I hope to be in heaven before these things happen.” I must inform you, good people, that these events have already happened. Our Blessed Mother came one last time to Garabandal to REAVEAL the third secret by Her actions. 

First of all, I will summarize the events of Garabandal. I will not go into detail for that is not necessary. I only include the very first year or two of events, because after that, chaos ensued because Our Lady’s message had been delivered and She said after the 1965 message, “This will be my last message”. So, anything coming after that was NOT from Our Lady. I will not try to put things in chronological order, nor will I be weaving a storyline. My intent is to summarize the main events that explain the third secret of Fatima.

The first thing that must be understood in the allegorical apparitions of Our Lady at Garabandal is that the children represent the Church Militant in the time of the Apostasy. Have you not wondered why Our Lady does the strange things that She does there? This is why! She was showing us THE THIRD SECRET. Have you never wondered why She would let the wickedness of men prevent the revelation of the secret which She wanted revealed without correcting the situation? She did no such thing. Just MONTHS after the deadline for the revelation of the secret had passed, She explained it to us.

THE CONTENTS OF THE THIRD SECRET IN ACTION

#1. Many Cardinals, many Bishops and many Priests are on the way to perdition and with them they are bringing many souls.

This is the GREAT APOSTASY about which we have been warned since St. Paul! What was about to happen in 1961 when Our Lady spoke these words? Vatican Council II (so called) was being prepared. Who attended that “Council”? Many Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests! Why did Our Lady want the secret revealed by 1960? Well, WHEN DID THE COUNCIL BEGIN? 1962!!!  Those who have eyes to see … WAKE UP!

#2. They were led through the streets and neighbourhoods of Garabandal as if looking for something. They kept their eyes on our Lady and were never harmed, never fell or tripped on the stone paths. They walked forward, backward, with their heads looking almost straight upwards, not looking where they were going.

The people will be (are) without shepherds to guide us. We must keep our eyes on heaven, on Our Lady and ultimately on Jesus Christ as St. Peter on the lake. As soon as we take our eyes off of Him and Her, we WILL sink. The Apostasy began at the top, with many Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests who led so many into perdition and want to lead us there too! But, how do we keep on the straight and narrow path when there is no shepherd to lead us? BUT - we do have guidance. Pope Pius XII and his predecessors provided us with the guidance we need to get through this. The Code of Canon Law, the Encyclicals, especially from Pope Gregory XVI through Pius XII, the Catechism of the Council of Trent, etc. 

Why did Our Lady lead the children through the streets seemingly without aim or direction? Remember, they represent the Church Militant. That is how the Church is now: without shepherd, without guidance, without pastors. Recall the words of Our Lord in the Gospel: When the shepherd has been struck, the sheep will scatter. However, the Church is indestructible, so the children never fell, never even tripped on a stone! But they wandered outside the village church and throughout the mountain paths  like sheep whose shepherd had been taken away. Why were our shepherds gone? See #1.

#3 The children saw Our Lady many times individually, or in pairs, but mostly not all together.

The Church Militant is in small pockets, scattered throughout the world. Those who have held on to the traditions, the true Faith, the true Mass, the true Discipline of Holy Mother Church and did not follow the apostate Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests into perdition are small groups here and there. They are visible, as the True Church is visible, but they are scattered because the shepherd has been struck. They cannot find him, because the Church is in eclipse!  But, Our Lady will reunite the remnant just as she called the children together each time.

#4. The Blessed Virgin at first led the children to the village church to adore Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament, but the new bishop forbade this. The children began to receive Holy Communion 
OUTSIDE OF THE VILLAGE CHURCH WHERE THE BISHOP HAD FORBIDDEN THEM TO COME.

Recall the quote of Pope Pius XII about the people searching in vain for the lamp of the sanctuary indicating the presence of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament: In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them, like Mary Magdalene weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, “where have they taken Him?”

Why did Our Lady not continue to lead the Church Militant (the children) to the village church to adore the Sacramental Jesus? Because the Bishop FORBADE IT! What did the apostate Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests do with the Mass at and after Vatican II? They brought in a 33rd Degree Freemason, Annibale Bugnini, and six (6) protestant ministers to invent a new “Mass” that would be agreeable and acceptable to protestants! They changed the necessary words required for validity. Pope Pius XII knew this was coming, even as far back as Daniel the prophet we were warned that the continual Sacrifice would cease. IT HAS CEASED! Not absolutely, but in its being continual. It used to be that, at any time, there was a Mass being offered somewhere in the world. That is no longer the case.

 The new mass is not new, and it is not the mass. It is essentially the same as the Anglican service invented by Cranmer in the 1600s and it is not the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

I ask you, Why did Our Lady have St. Michael give them (the CHURCH MILITANT!) Holy Communion outside? In the street? In parks? In barns? On the mountainside? To tell us that it would not be available IN THE CHURCHES! That is exactly the situation we are in. And please do not say that this could not happen. We were warned of it repeatedly since Daniel all the way up to Pope Pius XII!!!

The “new mass” is not valid. It is not Catholic. If you go there, you will be following the Cardinals, Bishops, and Priests into PERDITION. 

Recently, the Vatican ordered the words “for many” to be replaced in the novus ordo rite. However, it is too late. Not only is the rest of the novus ordo non Catholic, but the rites for the consecration of a bishop and of a priest were made invalid as well, by Giovanni Montini, aka Paul VI.

#5. Our Lady stressed the sanctity of Holy Matrimony and kissed many wedding rings.

The religious orders are all apparently dead, save for a few holy priests and nuns scattered throughout the world. It is the family that holds on to Traditional Catholicism that is the Church Militant now. Do not allow your children to enter convents or monasteries. Keep them at home. The end times are upon us. Let them build monasteries at home where they can try to lead monastic lives as best they can. It is a hard word, but true. The continual Sacrifice has ceased. It will not return until we have a True Pope.

#6. All of the visionaries have gone along with the invalid, protestant novus ordo “mass” and have accepted the heretical antipopes as legitimate, just as nearly all of the faithful did at first. This symbolises the state of the Church since Vatican II. But remember (see the video) that the Warning will take place at the same time as a Great Ecclesiastical Event! What might that EVENT be? The restoration of a TRUE POPE anathematising the Church of Antichrist and its antipopes?
           
#7  Conchita has said that there would be three (3) popes after “John XXIII”.

Following Angelo Roncalli, there have been five imposters claiming to be pope: Paul 6, John Paul 1, John Paul 2, Benedict 16 and now Francis. Five. Not Three. There are two possibilities: 1) Conchita is a fraud and a false prophet, because she said there would be three more but now there have been four. 2) The correct reason: THEY WERE NOT TRUE POPES. A quick investigation will let you find the proof for the following fact: All were/are heretics. 

See the following websites for the evidence:


1. A heretic is NOT a member of the Church.
2. One who is not a member of the Church, CANNOT be the HEAD of the Church.

What about all the Conciliar nonsense surrounding the apparitions?

Nobody can deny that there are unsettling things going on around Garabandal. Things that make a Catholic´s skin crawl. You can see the evidence at nearly all of the websites that cover the apparitions. However, remember what Our Lady said: on June 18th: 

"Since my message of October 18 has not been made known to the world and has not been fulfilled, I tell you that this is my last message.”

But then, the children kept on relaying messages?! Why? Did She not say that the message of June 18th was to be the last? She did. Everything that came after that was diabolical snares, not the words of The Blessed Virgin. Satan attempting to suppress and destroy the messages just as he did at Lourdes, La Salette, Fatima.


So what now?

The events Our Lady tried to prevent at Fatima have all happened. We must not try to figure out when the Warning and the Miracle/Great Event will take place. I am convinced that it will. She has been telling of it for centuries, “In the end My Immaculate Heart will triumph.” she said at Fatima.  She told Mother Mariana, the same thing in the 1600s. We know that Christ will return triumphant. But we do not know the date or the time. In fact, it is forbidden by Holy Mother Church to speculate on such things. The fact is, we must now hold on to the Church as it was when we last had a true shepherd – a TRUE POPE – October 9th, 1958 when Pope Pius XII died.

1. Realize that the whole structure, the hierarchy of the Church apostatized at Vatican II. There are no dioceses on the PLANET with valid bishops or priests. Stay away from them.

2. Never attend the novus ordo “mass” again. It is the worship of antichrist.

3. Pray the Rosary, Read the Bible, the Catholic bible, from before Vatican II, make acts of spiritual communion, perfect acts of contrition, pray the Little Office of the Blessed Virgin Mary – the Catholic one from before Vatican II.

4. Do not be always looking for signs and wonders. That is how we are manipulated into ignoring the most important things. Know that Christ will reign, the Immaculate Heart of Mary will triumph, but do not try to figure out WHEN. Those looking at Jesus and Mary and Joseph will not be distracted, but when you take your eyes away from them, you will sink.

5. Ignore everything coming from Garabandal after 1965. Our Lady said she had given her final message. Go with what she said before that. But – be prepared for the Warning and the Miracle.


I told you things were worse than you thought. Infinitely worse. But, at La Salette, France, Our Lady told the children that the Church would be in eclipse, the world would be in darkness, Rome would become the seat of the Antichrist. These messages were known and approved by Pope Pius IX and Pope Leo XIII. We know that in the end, Satan will be cast into hell for all eternity, and the remnant who keep the Faith will be in Heaven for all eternity. I pray that you and I will persevere until the end and be saved.

I am not a mystic, or a monk, or an erudite member of the Society of Jesus, or a contemplative Carmelite. These are just some thoughts that have come to mind that have comforted me, inspired me, edified me, reminded me that I am not alone, despite the loss of everything that I love, but never or rarely, actually experienced, including but not limited to, the Mass, the Sacraments, having a legitimate, bishop, pope, pastor. We have been warned by the precursor of the second coming of Christ that these things would come to pass. I hope that by sharing these thoughts, you may be similarly consoled, and helped to persevere until the end.


Friday, June 7, 2019

Some Thoughts on St. Jude Shrine



Often, when a Catholic of good will becomes aware that the Novus Ordo is NOT the True Catholic Church, after the initial shock wears off, he begins to seek the answer to the question, "Well, now what do I do?" In the process of searching for "where they have laid Him", he will find many groups of laymen making the following claim:

"We believe as the Church has always believed. We keep the Faith and Discipline of the Holy Catholic Church as it was at the time of the death of His Holiness, Pope Pius XII."

However, nearly ALL of these groups are making false claims. They do not really keep the Faith and Discipline of the Church as it was at the death of Pope Pius XII. They pick and choose (definition of heresy) what they will keep and what they will cast aside with claims of epikeia, or the salvation of souls is the ultimate law. Their clergy, ordained without having been sent, set up their chapels and invite the faithful to come to their services. They even go so far as to set up marriage tribunals and annul marriages with no authority to do so. 

St. Jude Shrine is one of the very few places where the faithful are truly seeking to maintain the Faith and Discipline of the Church as it was under Pope Pius XII.  Rejecting the panicked tendency to seek out men who have taken schismatic positions IN VIOLATION of the explicit will of Pope Pius XII, Canon Law, etc, by having themselves ordained priests and consecrated bishops without a papal mandate.

It seems that everybody and his brother thinks he needs to do something to resolve the crisis in the Church. However, this cannot be done by seeking out men who have had themselves "Consecrated" a bishop or "Ordained" a priest. Never mind the fact that they were not called by Holy Mother Church nor sent by Her. They insist that Christ cannot manage His Church without them taking charge and, despite the clearly established Canons of the Church, having THEMSELVES ordained or consecrated - or both - and inflicting themselves on the laity who think that everything must be OK since the man wears the same clothes as the real priests and bishops that they have seen in pictures and videos from the past. Despite the fact that they are violating the clear and explicit  canons of the law and the teachings of the Popes regarding the unity of the Church, they simply MUST ACT, the law of the Church notwithstanding. But, as Pope Pius XII wrote By this crime, the unity of the Church is being seriously attacked. (Definition of  Schism). Nothing but disorder wherever they go, just as the Holy Father warned in Ad Apostolorum Principis. They claim that the principle of Epikeia covers their violation of the canons, when, in reality, the fact that they (invalidly) invoke this principle clearly indicates that they know they are violating the law. 

36. Here We must mention a symptom of this falling away from the Church. It is a very serious matter and fills Our heart -- the heart of a Father and universal Pastor of the faithful -- with a grief that defies description. For those who profess themselves most interested in the welfare of their country have for some considerable time been striving to disseminate among the people the position, devoid of all truth, that Catholics have the power of directly electing their bishops. To excuse this kind of election they allege a need to look after the good souls with all possible speed and to entrust the administration of dioceses to those pastors who, because they do not oppose the communist desires and political methods, are acceptable by the civil power.
37. We have heard that many such elections have been held contrary to all right and law and that, in addition, certain ecclesiastics have rashly dared to receive episcopal consecration, despite the public and severe warning which this Apostolic See gave those involved. Since, therefore, such serious offenses against the discipline and unity of the Church are being committed, We must in conscience warn all that this is completely at variance with the teachings and principles on which rests the right order of the society divinely instituted by Jesus Christ our Lord.
38. For it has been clearly and expressly laid down in the canons that it pertains to the one Apostolic See to judge whether a person is fit for the dignity and burden of the episcopacy,[11] and that complete freedom in the nomination of bishops is the right of the Roman Pontiff.[12] But if, as happens at times, some persons or groups are permitted to participate in the selection of an episcopal candidate, this is lawful only if the Apostolic See has allowed it in express terms and in each particular case for clearly defined persons or groups, the conditions and circumstances being very plainly determined.
39. Granted this exception, it follows that bishops who have been neither named nor confirmed by the Apostolic See, but who, on the contrary, have been elected and consecrated in defiance of its express orders, enjoy no powers of teaching or of jurisdiction since jurisdiction passes to bishops only through the Roman Pontiff as We admonished in the Encyclical Letter Mystici Corporis in the following words: ". . . As far as his own diocese is concerned each (bishop) feeds the flock entrusted to him as a true shepherd and rules it in the name of Christ. Yet in exercising this office they are not altogether independent but are subordinate to the lawful authority of the Roman Pontiff, although enjoying ordinary power of jurisdiction which they receive directly from the same Supreme Pontiff." 
40. And when We later addressed to you the letter Ad Sinarum gentem, We again referred to this teaching in these words: "The power of jurisdiction which is conferred directly by divine right on the Supreme Pontiff comes to bishops by that same right, but only through the successor of Peter, to whom not only the faithful but also all bishops are bound to be constantly subject and to adhere both by the reverence of obedience and by the bond of unity." 
41. Acts requiring the power of Holy Orders which are performed by ecclesiastics of this kind, though they are valid as long as the consecration conferred on them was valid, are yet gravely illicit, that is, criminal and sacrilegious. 
42. To such conduct the warning words of the Divine Teacher fittingly apply: "He who enters not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbs up another way, is a thief and a robber."[15] The sheep indeed know the true shepherd's voice. "But a stranger they will not follow, but will flee from him, because they do not know the voice of strangers."
43. We are aware that those who thus belittle obedience in order to justify themselves with regard to those functions which they have unrighteously assumed, defend their position by recalling a usage which prevailed in ages past. Yet everyone sees that all ecclesiastical discipline is overthrown if it is in any way lawful for one to restore arrangements which are no longer valid because the supreme authority of the Church long ago decreed otherwise. In no sense do they excuse their way of acting by appealing to another custom, and they indisputably prove that they follow this line deliberately in order to escape from the discipline which now prevails and which they ought to be obeying.
44. We mean that discipline which has been established not only for China and the regions recently enlightened by the light of the Gospel, but for the whole Church, a discipline which takes its sanction from that universal and supreme power of caring for, ruling, and governing which our Lord granted to the successors in the office of St. Peter the Apostle.
45. Well known are the terms of Vatican Council's solemn definition: "Relying on the open testimony of the Scriptures and abiding by the wise and clear decrees both of our predecessors, the Roman Pontiffs, and the general Councils, We renew the definition of the Ecumenical Council of Florence, by virtue of which all the faithful must believe that 'the Holy Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff hold primacy over the whole world, and the Roman Pontiff himself is the Successor of the blessed Peter and continues to be the true Vicar of Christ and head of the whole Church, the father and teacher of all Christians, and to him is the blessed Peter our Lord Jesus Christ committed the full power of caring for, ruling and governing the Universal Church....'
46. "We teach, . . . We declare that the Roman Church by the Providence of God holds the primacy of ordinary power over all others, and that this power of jurisdiction of the Roman Pontiff, which is truly episcopal, is immediate. Toward it, the pastors and the faithful of whatever rite and dignity, both individually and collectively, are bound by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience, not only in matters which pertain to faith and morals, but also in those which concern the discipline and government of the Church spread throughout the whole world, in such a way that once the unity of communion and the profession of the same Faith has been preserved with the Roman Pontiff, there is one flock of the Church of Christ under one supreme shepherd. This is the teaching of the Catholic truth from which no one can depart without loss of faith and salvation." 
47. From what We have said, it follows that no authority whatsoever, save that which is proper to the Supreme Pastor, can render void the canonical appointment granted to any bishop; that no person or group, whether of priests or of laymen, can claim the right of nominating bishops; that no one can lawfully confer episcopal consecration unless he has received the mandate of the Apostolic See.
48. Consequently, if consecration of this kind is being done contrary to all right and law, and by this crime the unity of the Church is being seriously attacked, an excommunication reserved specialissimo modo to the Apostolic See has been established which is automatically incurred by the consecrator and by anyone who has received consecration irresponsibly conferred.
49. What then is to be the opinion concerning the excuse added by members of the association promoting false patriotism, that they had to act as they alleged because of the need to tend to the souls in those dioceses which were then without a bishop? 
50. It is obvious that no thought is being taken of the spiritual good of the faithful if the Church's laws are being violated, and further, there is no question of vacant sees, as they wish to argue in defense, but of episcopal sees whose legitimate rulers have been driven out or now languish in prison or are being obstructed in various ways from the free exercise of their power of jurisdiction. It must likewise be added that those clerics have been cast into prison, exiled, or removed by other means, whom the lawful ecclesiastical superiors had designated in accordance with canon law and the special powers received from the Apostolic See to act in their place in the government of the dioceses.
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius12/P12APOST.HTM

At St. Jude Shrine, however, we really DO seek to fight for Holy Mother Church while still  obeying Pope Pius XII and all of Canon Law, despite the hardships and criticisms of those who feel at liberty to disregard the clearly stated opinion of the lawgiver. Despite the attacks of those who feel that Holy Mother Church bound Her children to obey bad laws in the 1917 Code of Canon Law; who believe that they are more knowledgeable about the Faith than the Vicar of Christ who promulgated it with the following words:

Therefore, having invoked the aid of Divine grace, and relying upon the authority of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, of Our own accord and with certain knowledge, and in the fullness of the Apostolic power with which we are invested, by this Our Constitution, which we wish to be valid for all times, We promulgate, decree, and order that the present Code, just as it is compiled, shall have from this time forth the power of law for the Universal Church, and We confide it to your custody and vigilance.

[snip]

Notwithstanding all contrary regulations, constitutions, privileges, even those worthy of special and individual mention, and notwithstanding contrary customs, even though they be immemorial, or whatever else may run counter to this Constitution.

For no one, therefore, is it lawful willingly to contradict or rashly to disobey in any way this Our constitution, ordination, limitation, suppression or derogation. If anyone should dare to do so, let him know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.

Given at Rome, from Saint Peter‘s, on the Feast of Pentecost of the year one thousand nine hundred and seventeen, the third year of Our Pontificate.

When the Code of Canon Law was promulgated every Catholic accepted these laws as binding laws of God's infallible Church.

During the hundred years or so before the Eclipse of the Church began in 1958, the Vicar of Christ began to prepare the faithful for the onslaught they would have to endure when they would be without a shepherd to guide them along the straight and narrow path. By means of encyclicals, bulls, letters, locutions, and every other means at their disposal, the true Popes laid down what would be needed for the Catholics of our days to make it safely through the treacherous waters of the Great Apostasy. Ultimately, providentially, providing us with the codification of Canon Law in 1917, within days of the beginning of Our Lady's apparitions in Fatima where she warned us that the Apostasy was about to begin. Was this a coincidence? Of course not!


This Code of Canon Law provides the Catholic in this Apostasy with the guidance necessary to make it safely to the port of heaven. There is no need to understand and interpret Divine Law, Theology, Philosophy, or Ecclesiology in order to remain in safe waters. All one need do is consult the Code of Canon Law and OBEY IT. 

Is there not enough chaos in the Church now without men deeming themselves worthy of the Episcopate or Priesthood without ANY right or mandate from Holy Mother Church? Any man who does so is not a shepherd, but  "enters not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbs up another way, is a thief and a robber." Catholics must stay away from such men who are, according to Pope Pius XII, EXCOMMUNICATED. 

Far from acting upon such a schismatic attitude, the Faithful have approached priests who were validly and licitly ordained and received jurisdiction from Bishops who were sent by Holy Mother Church, asking them for the Sacraments as permitted by the following Canons:



Canon 2261:

§2. The faithful, with due regard for the prescriptions of §3, can for any just cause seek the Sacraments and Sacramentals from one excommunicated, especially if other ministers are lacking, and then the one who is excommunicate and approached can administer these and is under no obligation of inquiring the reasons from the one requesting.

§3. But from a banned excommunicate and from others excommunicated after a condemnatory or declaratory sentence has come, only the faithful in danger of death can ask for the sacramental absolution according to the norm of Canon 882 and 2252, and even, if other ministers are lacking, other Sacraments and Sacramentals.

Canon 2264:

Acts of jurisdiction, whether for the external forum or the internal forum, placed by one excommunicated are illicit; and if a condemnatory or declaratory sentence has been laid down, they are also invalid with due regard for the prescription of Canon 2261 §3; otherwise, they are valid and, indeed, are even licit if they are sought by a member of the faithful according to the norm of the mentioned Canon 2261, §2.

As the commentary on canon law by Father Augustine, points out, Canon 2254 stipulates that, "In more urgent cases, any duly approved confessor may validly and licitly absolve from each and every censure, no matter how and to whom it is reserved, provided it is a censure latae sententiae" (see pages 158-169). Thus, the canon affirms that absolution from all penalties may be granted in cases that are latae sententiae, that is, automatic, as distinguished from instances when the penalty is ferendae sententiae, or in other words, by means of a judicial sentence imposed by an ecclesiastical prelate.

Canon 2254

§1. In more urgent cases, namely if the automatic censure cannot be observed exteriorly without danger of grave scandal or infamy, or if it is hard on the penitent to remain in a state of grave sin for the time necessary for the competent Superior to provide, then any confessor in the sacramental forum can absolve from these, no matter how reserved, [and he will enjoin] the burden of having recourse, under pain of reincidence, within a month at [most] by letter and through the confessor, if this can be done without grave inconvenience, withholding the name, to the S. Penitentiary or to a Bishop of other superior endowed with the faculty [of absolving], and standing by his mandates.

§3. But if in some extraordinary case this recourse is morally impossible, then the confessor himself, except in a case that concerns the absolution of a censure mentioned in Canon 2367, can grant absolution without the burden [mentioned above] but with the injunctions of law nevertheless enjoined, and imposing an appropriate penance and satisfaction for the censure, such that, unless the penitent within an appropriate time determined by the confessor performs the penance and gives the satisfaction, he reincurs the censure.

During the diabolical assault on the Church by the masonic, apostate antipopes beginning with Angelo Roncalli, aka John XXIII, the entire Church was deceived into believing that the destruction caused by these antipopes was actually being mandated by authentic Vicars of Christ. Yes, there were a handful of laymen and priests who immediately were aware of the ruse and opposed it heroically. Fr. Oswald Baker in England, Fr. Saenz y Arriaga in Mexico, Fr. Emmet Buckley in Texas, are some examples. However, nearly all others went along with the changes believing that they were obeying Holy Mother Church. There was no internet available to people at that time whereby people could find out the things that we know now. 

One could not be accused of heresy or schism for obeying, in good will, what appeared to be the legitimate command of the Pope, especially when it was done with such diabolical cleverness, slowly and deliberately so that the changes were almost imperceptible to the faithful. The acceptance of these changes can, in hindsight, be seen as wrong, but at the time these things were happening, such acceptance could not, in most cases, be called heresy because heresy implies the knowledge that one is rejecting the teaching of the Church. Nor can schism be charged against them because to be schismatic one must know that he is separating himself from the fold. This was rarely the case with the rank and file clergy and laity of the time. The most that can be said is that they were in error; they were mistaken. They were neither heretical nor schismatic. 

As time wore on and the situation became more clear, many laity and priests began to become aware of the situation and to act upon this awareness. As one becomes aware of his error, he is then obliged to act to correct his error. It is no small matter to decide that what the world considers to be the Roman Catholic Church is actually the Church of Antichrist! It is a serious decision fraught with danger, not to be taken lightly; but the decision must be made once the truth becomes clear. To be aware that one is following and obeying a false church and a false doctrine and to continue in that church is indeed schismatic and heretical.

The priests at St. Jude Shrine have gone through this heart-rending process of realization that they had been deceived and would have to separate from the monstrous thing that was pretending to be the Bride of Christ. When they were made aware of their error, they left the false church, suffering great losses in terms of friendships, pensions, esteem of their colleagues. They abandoned the false novus ordo service and the false teachings of Vatican II.

The question, then, is: What about the situation of St. Jude Shrine and the priests who serve there with respect to Canon Law? Either (1) The priests there were only in error and were never pertinacious in it, hence never incurred any canonical sanction;  or (2) The priests were excommunicated latae sententiae which is the worst that could have happened since there was no competent authority which could lay down an excommunication by name. A ferendae sententiae, or in other words, a judicial sentence imposed by an ecclesiastical prelate, is impossible due to the utter absence of any ecclesiastical prelate to impose such a sentence.

The priests there were only in error and were never pertinacious in it, as evidenced by their return to the true Mass and Catholic discipline when they learned the truth. If this is the case, they never incurred any canonical sanction. Some may question whether a priest who was taken in by the diabolical maneuvering of the enemies of Christ and His Church for a time is permitted to resume his priestly activities once he discovers his situation and leaves the church which he erroneously believed to be the Catholic Church.

The situation in which we find ourselves could hardly be more urgent. Therefore, the priests at St. Jude Shrine are authorized to absolve validly and licitly from each and every censure since there is no question of their being excommunicated vitandi since there is no authority who could possibly make such a declaration.

So, even if the priests had been excommunicated, and had not received absolution and release of his automatically incurred penalty, the faithful would STILL be permitted to receive the Sacraments from him, again, provided his "excommunication" was incurred automatically, and not by declaratory sentence. 

In the text of his explanation of Canon 2261 ("Reception and Administration of Sacraments and Sacramentals"), Fr. Augustine makes it quite clear that Canon 2261 corresponds to "Martin V's decree, "Ad evitanda", in that an excommunicated priest may administer the Sacraments and Sacramentals to the faithful who request them in any serious need (which they themselves may determine) when, "the minister is not vitandus nor under a declaratory or condemnatory sentence ...".  

Pope Martin V issued Ad evitanda in the wake of the confusion caused by the claims of three different men to be pope during the Great western schism. 

Ad Evitanda Scandala
Pope Martin V, 1418.


To avoid scandals and many dangers and relieve timorous consciences by the tenor of these presents we mercifully grant to all Christ's faithful that no one henceforth shall be bound to abstain from communion with anyone in the administration or reception of the sacraments or in any other religious or non-religious acts whatsoever, nor to avoid anyone nor to observe any ecclesiastical interdict, on pretext of any ecclesiastical sentence or censure globally promulgated whether by the law or by an individual; unless the sentence or censure in question has been specifically and expressly published or denounced by the judge on or against a definite person, college, university, church, community or place. Notwithstanding any apostolic or other constitutions to the contrary, save the case of someone of whom it shall be known so notoriously that he has incurred the sentence passed by the canon for laying sacrilegious hands upon a cleric that the fact cannot be concealed by any tergiversation nor excused by any legal defence. For we will abstain from communion with such a one, in accordance with the canonical sanctions, even though he be not denounced. (Fontes I, 45.)

The Code of Canon Law was promulgated in 1917 within hours of the moment when Our Lady of Fatima came to warn us of the coming Great Apostasy which has made the Great Western Schism look like a children’s game. It is clear that our Holy Mother Church, always mindful of the safety of Her children, produced these Canons for the good of the faithful during these times when we are without a shepherd to guide us. However, we are not without guidance! We have the Code of Canon law, compiled and promulgated by two of the last true Vicars of Christ because the Holy Ghost knew what was about to happen and that we were going to need help to find and keep to the narrow way that leads to Heaven.

What distinguishes St. Jude Shrine from nearly every “Traditional Chapel” is the manner of its operation and the fact that the priests received their orders and mandate before Vatican II from bishops who had jurisdiction and order from Pope Pius XII.  It is the faithful who run the Shrine and invite the priests to come and offer Holy Mass and hear confessions in accordance with Canon 2261 and Canon 2264. The priests who fulfil these requests have also availed themselves of the same laws issued by our loving Mother the Church to guide us in these times of apostasy.

Nearly all of the so-called "Traditional" priests and societies have opened "Mass Centers" or "Parishes" and invited the faithful to attend. This is schismatic - an absolute violation of Canon Law and an attack on the unity of the Church. Even if their priests did have jurisdiction (which they do NOT - even by their own admission) they would be in schism due to their opening chapels and inviting the faithful to attend, rather than the faithful initiating the request for the Sacraments.

These Canons provide sufficient proof that the senior clergy, who were ordained in the traditional rite and received faculties from Pius XII bishops, can validly and lawfully administer the Sacraments to the faithful in any serious need as long as it is the faithful who request them.  If the unprecedented conditions under which the Church is presently operating do not constitute a serious need for the Sacraments, then what would?

St. Jude Shrine has been a Harbor of Orthodoxy and valid and licit Sacraments for Catholics since 1975 and has been under attack since the very beginning from every quarter. It operates strictly according to Canon Law. There are those who would accuse us of obeying the Church too much. So be it. What greater glory that to be accused of that. If they base their ire on the belief that the Church has bound the faithful to bad laws, however, I would remind them that the same encyclical of Pope Pius XII, Ad Apostolorum Principis, says about obedience:


"... the successor of Peter, to whom not only the faithful but also all bishops are bound to be constantly subject and to adhere both by the reverence of obedience and by the bond of unity." 
and that the Code of Canon law promulgated by Pope Benedict XV via the Apostolic Constitution Providentissima Mater Ecclesia ends with the following:

Therefore, having sought the aid of Divine grace, trusting in the authority of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, moved Ourselves, of Our certain knowledge and in the fullness of the Apostolic power with which we are invested, by this Our constitution, which We wish to be binding for all time: We promulgate, and We decree and order that the present Code, just as it is drawn up, have in future the force of law for the universal Church, and We entrust if for safekeeping to your custody and vigilence.
...

Wherefore, let no one violate or rashly oppose in any way this document of Our constitution, ordinance, limitation, suppression, derrogation and expressed will. And if anyone shall presume to attempt to do so, let him know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of his Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.


Psalm 122, prayed each day in the Little Office of the Blessed Virgin Mary gives us both our proper approach to these evil times and a reminder that at the proper moment, God will send Our Lady to intervene:

Ad te levavi
A prayer in affliction, with confidence in God. 
A gradual canticle.
[1] To thee have I lifted up my eyes, who dwellest in heaven. [2] Behold as the eyes of servants are on the hands of their masters, As the eyes of the handmaid are on the hands of her mistress: so are our eyes unto the Lord our God, until he have mercy on us. [3] Have mercy on us, O Lord, have mercy on us: for we are greatly filled with contempt. [4] For our soul is greatly filled: we are a reproach to the rich, and contempt to the proud.

Let us keep our eyes on Our Lord and Our Lady and TRUST that God's loving Providence will never be wanting, but we must keep faithful, be obedient to His Law and His Vicars. His Providence has provided us with Canon Law, Encyclicals, and the teaching of the Magisterium, all of which prepared us for this situation. We must trust that He will see us through it!

Psalm 18, recited during Matins each day reminds us of the importance of God's Law and that we must keep it:

Coeli enarrant. The works of God shew forth his glory: his law is greatly to be esteemed and loved.

 [8] The law of the Lord is unspotted, converting souls: the testimony of the Lord is faithful, giving wisdom to little nes. [9] The justices of the Lord are right, rejoicing hearts: the commandment of the Lord is lightsome, enlightening the eyes. [10] The fear of the Lord is holy, enduring for ever and ever: the judgments of the Lord are true, justified in themselves.
[11] More to be desired than gold and many precious stones: and sweeter than honey and the honeycomb. [12] For thy servant keepeth them, and in keeping them there is a great reward. 

Friday, May 17, 2019

Notre Dame du Laus

Celebrated Sanctuaries of the Madonna

Tenth in a Series


Laus
In this series, condensed from a book written by Fr. Northcote prior to 1868 on various famous Sanctuaries of Our Lady, the author succeeds in defending the honor of Our Blessed Mother and the truth of the Catholic Faith against the wily criticism of many Protestants.
While some material covered in this chapter of Fr. Northcote's book has already been discussed in Salve Maria Regina No. 160, Fr. Northcote adds many interesting facts, as well as his usual excellent apologetics.

Our Lady of Laus, France

Benoite YouthAt about two leagues (about 7 miles) distance from the city of Gap, in the district of the High Alps, lies the little valley of Laus, shut in by wooded mountains and surrounded by other valleys, through which the river L’Avance winds its way. A more picturesque locality can hardly be imagined. The mountains of Colombis and St. Maurice appear clothed with forests to their very summits, whilst to the south appear the distant peaks of the Lower Alps, contrasting in their barren and savage grandeur with the rich vegetation which adorns the hills in the immediate vicinity of Laus. As the traveler approaches this beautiful region from the valley of L’Avance, he suddenly discovers the church of Laus lying as it were at his feet, and is reminded by a profusion of pious monuments which meet his eye at every turn that he is approaching a place specially consecrated to devotion. Chapels and crosses rise on all sides to commemorate some event in the life of the poor shepherdess to whom the place owes all its celebrity, and the marvels of whose story receive a certain confirmation from what we may call a greater marvel still. A simple unlettered peasant girl two centuries ago kept her sheep on these mountains, and succeeded in transforming a rude and unfrequented wilderness into a vast focus of religious life; leaving among her native hills so vivid a memory of herself, that time and revolution have not had power to destroy it, and our own unbelieving century still beholds pilgrims resorting to the spots made memorable by the apparitions of Our Lady to the shepherdess Benoîte.
We shall relate the story of the servant of God simply as it has been preserved, without retrenching anything from the marvelous character attached to it. And let it be remembered that these events did not take place in the dim religious light of mediaeval antiquity, nor are they magnified in our eyes as we behold them through the mist of a long series of centuries. The Shepherdess of Laus lived during a period when the faith of Europe was on the wane, and when men were disposed to anything rather than an over-credulous superstition.
Benoîte Rancurel was born at St. Etienne on the feast of St. Michael, 1647. Her parents were humble peasants who lived by the labor of their hands; and in her twelfth year, Benoîte was put out to service, to keep the sheep of a neighboring farmer, taking her clothes and her Rosary as her only property. During her childhood she had been distinguished for her great tenderness to the poor, and had once earned a sound beating from her mother for giving away food during a time of famine; she had also early evinced a remarkable love of prayer. So much distress prevailed at that time in the country that her master was unable to charge himself with her whole maintenance, and to earn a living Benoîte hired herself out during alternate weeks to a poor widow. The farmer was a brutal character, who up to that time had never been able to keep anyone in his service, but the simplicity and sweetness of Benoîte not only protected her from his cruelty, but had such a softening effect on his hard nature, that in a short time he became another man.
The widow was almost as destitute as Benoîte herself, and the little shepherdess found ample opportunities for exercising her cherished virtue of charity, often sharing her scanty provisions among the six hungry children of the house, and silencing their scruples by the assurance that she herself would have plenty to eat next week. It was thus she grew up in the midst of labor and privation, simple, charitable, and devout, when one day, chancing to hear a sermon wherein the village curé spoke much of the love of the Blessed Virgin for sinners, and the singular protection which She extended to those who consecrated themselves to Her service, Benoîte conceived an ardent desire of being numbered among Her special clients. At the same time the wish sprang up in her heart that she might be found worthy to behold the Blessed Mother of God, of whose mercy and tenderness to the unfortunate She had heard so much.
St. MauriceShe was accustomed to frequently lead her sheep to the mountain of St. Maurice, on the summit of which stood an old ruined chapel, dedicated to that Saint. One day in May of the year 1664, Benoîte who was then about sixteen years of age, sat down near the ruins to pray her Rosary; she was ignorant of what had been the nature of the building, and also of the fact that close to it was to be found a spring of water, though this latter circumstance would have been most welcome news, for during her long days on the barren hillside, she often suffered greatly from thirst. As she sat thus with her flock grazing around, she perceived an old man approaching her, of venerable aspect, dressed in red and wearing a beard. He asked her what she was doing there, to which she replied, with her usual simplicity, that she was watching her sheep and praying to the good God, but that she was very thirsty. Yet there is water close by you, said the old man; and he then pointed out the well, which is still to be seen, and which to this day produces an abundance of excellent water. Benoîte, who had no suspicion of her visitor, thanked him heartily, and pressed him to eat some of her bread, when he made known to her that he was St. Maurice, the patron of that mountain, and desired her to lead her flock to a valley near St. Etienne, where the desire of her heart would be granted to her.
The spot indicated is a sort of ravine which extends from the village to the borders of the forest which crowns the hill; on the eastern side is still pointed out a little cavern where Benoîte was in the habit of retiring to say her Rosary before taking her frugal repast. Hither therefore the little shepherdess directed her steps on the following day, and towards evening she saw standing on a rock, known as Les Fours (The Ovens—a chapel now stands on the spot, erected in 1835), a Lady and Child both of singular beauty. The Lady did not speak to her, and for two months these apparitions were constantly renewed on the same spot, before Benoîte summoned courage to ask Her name. Nevertheless, although not a word had been spoken by her visitor, Her presence filled the heart of Benoîte with joy, and a certain spiritual illumination; but it does not seem certain that she recognized who it was who thus appeared to her, and though on returning home she spoke to all her neighbors of the beautiful Lady she had seen on the rock, she never gave them any reason to suppose that she had been favored with a heavenly vision.
Les FoursDuring these two months the flocks showed the same mysterious attraction to the valley of St. Etienne as their young mistress, a fact the more remarkable as the ravine was rocky and barren, and the pasturage extremely scanty. The neighbors were not slow to inform the farmer that if he allowed his sheep to be driven every day to a spot where there was nothing for them to eat, he would lose them all, and become the laughing-stock of the village. As to the farmer's wife, she also had complaints to make of Benoîte, who now never returned till late in the evening, and who on her appearance was commonly received with blows. In obedience to her master's orders therefore, Benoîte conducted her flock to a better pasturage, lying in a different direction from her favorite ravine, but no sooner had they reached the spot indicated by the farmer, which afforded an abundance of excellent grass, than of their own accord they set off at full speed to the barren valley in spite of every effort made by Benoîte to stop them. When this fact was related to the farmer he would not believe it, and to ensure his orders being carried out, the next day he led his sheep to pasture himself, but had the mortification of seeing them all trot off in the direction of the forbidden ravine by a sort of instinct which he found himself unable to overcome. He was forced to admit that there was something in it which he did not understand, and seeing that the sheep were really in better condition than those of his neighbors, he thenceforth allowed Benoîte to do as she pleased.
After this time the mysterious apparition was very frequently renewed, and Benoîte was allowed not only to see, but even to converse with Her whom she still called by no other name than that of her Beautiful Lady. The matter was talked of in the neighborhood, and one of the magistrates of the province, named Mr. Grimaud, considered it his duty to interrogate the shepherdess on the subject. Benoîte answered all his questions with the utmost simplicity, but as she declared herself entirely ignorant who the Beautiful Lady was, the magistrate was at a loss what to think. The advice he gave her, however, was to make a good Confession and Communion, and then, the next time she saw the Lady, to approach Her and respectfully enquire Her name. Benoîte followed the wise counsel, and having prepared herself by a worthy reception of the Sacraments, she summoned the courage to ask the Lady who She was. I am Mary, the Mother of Jesus, was the reply, and it is the will of My Son that I should be honored in this parish, though not on this spot. You will therefore request the Prior to come hither in procession together with his parishioners. Benoîte, filled with joy on learning who her Beautiful Lady was, hastened to communicate her orders to the Prior, who after careful investigation of the facts decided on giving credence to the heavenly message, and, on August 29, a solemn procession was made to the valley, at which all the villagers assisted, headed by their pastor.
PindreauAfter this incident, Benoîte was given to understand that she would not again behold Our Lady in that valley; and it was not until a month later that she was favored with another apparition. This time Our Lady appeared on a little eminence (Pindreau – image right) near the road leading from Laus to St. Etienne, now marked by a small oratory, and made known to Benoîte that if she wished to see Her again, she must repair to a little chapel at Laus, the road to which She pointed out. The next day Benoîte found her way to the chapel in question; it bore the title of Notre Dame de Bon Rencontre (Our Lady of Good Meeting), and had been built in 1640, but since then had fallen into partial ruin. The sight of its dusty walls and neglected altar filled Benoîte with sorrow when she reflected that this was the chosen sanctuary of the Mother of God, but Our Lady made known to her that before long this poor and squalid building would be replaced by a large church, richly adorned, and served by many priests, that many poor sinners would be converted here, and that the money required for such a building would be furnished from the pence of the poor.
Bon RecontreFrom this time on Benoîte every day visited the chapel, where she spent long hours in prayer, leaving her flock to the care of Providence. No accident ever befell them, nor did her master oppose her doing as she chose. The rumor of what had passed very soon spread among the villagers, and induced them also to resort to the little oratory in ever-increasing numbers. Many of these, touched by grace, devoutly prepared themselves for the Sacraments, and it was found necessary to engage priests to attend on the spot to hear the confessions of the pilgrims. The chapel very soon became too small to contain the hundreds who daily presented themselves, and an altar for the celebration of Mass had to be erected out of doors, while the priests heard confessions under the rocks and trees of the valley. Whole parishes came hither in procession from many miles' distance, thirty-five such processions arriving on a single day. Some of these had journeyed on foot for fourteen hours, and this manifestation of popular devotion took place before any official examination had been made into the circumstances to which it owed its origin. Many signal graces, both spiritual and temporal, were granted to the prayers of the pilgrims; miraculous cures, and striking conversions were of continued recurrence.
At length in September, 1665, the ecclesiastical authorities felt it their duty to investigate the whole affair. M. Lambert, the Vicar-General of the diocese of Embrun, accompanied by twenty-two other ecclesiastics of rank and learning, proceeded to Laus to initiate a juridical inquiry. Benoîte was subjected by them to a severe examination. The Vicar-General made her understand that they were not come there to authorize her visions and foolish fancies, and that if she was detected of any imposture, she would be severely punished. One after another the examiners then attacked her with questions, arguments, and even with ridicule; they strove now to embarrass and now to intimidate her, but the simplicity and integrity of the poor shepherdess withstood the trial, and she replied to their questions with a precision and modest self-possession that filled them with surprise.
CuresProvidence had so ordered it, that the Vicar-General and his companions should themselves be eyewitnesses of a striking miracle wrought during their visit. Twice they had made preparations to depart, and each time violent torrents of rain had obliged them to return to their lodgings. It seemed as if against their wills they were to be detained at Laus, in order to be able to bear witness to one of those prodigies the truth of which they were as yet unwilling to allow. On the very day they were to leave, a poor crippled woman, named Catherine Vial, who had for years been entirely deprived of the use of her limbs which were withered and bent under her, was suddenly restored to strength on the ninth day of a novena which she had made to Notre Dame du Laus. Every day during the novena, the Vicar-General had seen her carried to and from the chapel, and it was while he himself was offering Mass at the altar, that he now beheld her enter, walking alone and without support, and heard the by-standers exclaiming, a miracle! a miracle! Catherine Vial is cured!
I myself was serving his Mass, writes M. Gaillard, the Grand-Vicar of Gap, who has preserved all these particulars, and I perceived he was so overcome that he could hardly finish the Last Gospel, and the cards on the altar were moistened with his tears. (A month later the parish of St. Julien to which Catherine belonged, made the pilgrimage to Laus in procession, their banner being carried by Catherine herself.)
A fresh inquiry was now set on foot into the truth of this fact; not only the woman herself and her family, but the two surgeons who had attended her, were rigorously questioned. The latter were both Calvinists, and when they heard of the proposed novena, had declared themselves willing to become Catholics if they should see her ever able to walk again. They had seen her returning from the chapel, and not only attested that her disease had been incurable by human means, but avowed themselves convinced by that they had seen, and ready to abjure their heresy. The record of these events was drawn up by the Vicar-General, who desired that a Te Deum should be chanted in the chapel in thanksgiving for so signal a grace, and who became from that time the firm protector and friend of the shepherdess, and of the work of which she was chosen as the instrument.
And in fact poor Benoîte was often subjected to trials, wherein she stood in need of protection. Many persons of rank and influence regarded her as an impostor, and attempts were made not only to bring her into discredit, but even to have her driven from Laus and consigned to prison. In spite of this hostility however, the pilgrimages continued to increase, and four years after the first apparition of Our Lady in the chapel of Laus, M. Lambert decided on erecting a church on the site of the chapel, which was altogether inadequate for the wants of the pilgrims. M. Gaillard met him at Laus in order to consult with him on the subject, and has left an account of what passed on the occasion. The plan of the Vicar-General was to build a small church, seven or eight fathoms long (a ‘fathom’ is six feet), containing two or three altars. On the representation of M. Gaillard that it ought to be at least fifteen fathoms, he replied that he had never contemplated such an undertaking, that the pilgrimages would probably last at most a dozen years, and would then die away, and that it would be impossible to find funds for so large a building. After some demur he at last consented that the foundations should be dug for twelve fathoms, and entrusted the direction of the works to M. Gaillard.
I remember very well, he writes, that when we began to dig the foundations we had no money; we had some alms-boxes made, and M. Naz, one of the directors of the works, asked alms with one of these. A poor woman dressed in rags, to whom one would have felt disposed to give relief if one had met her on the road, came gently behind him, and slipped in a Louis d’or (a small gold coin weighing just under 1/4 of an ounce); that was sufficient for the first week. The next week we had ten crowns, and so it went on, so that we were never in want either of money, material, or workmen; it was the 'pence of the poor' that built the entire church, though in point of fact it cost more than 15,000 livres (pounds).
Chapel of LausThe pilgrims aided the rising work with their alms and their labor. It became the custom, whenever a parochial procession visited Laus, for every member of it – man, woman, and child – to bring a stone. A year was devoted to collecting the necessary materials, and then the building began in good earnest. We have said that M. Gaillard had originally proposed to M. Lambert that the length of the church should be fifteen fathoms, and singularly enough the additional length was added by order of the Vicar-General, who on coming to survey the works found that by some unaccountable omission no provision had been made in the plans for a sanctuary; he therefore ordered one to be added to the erection then in progress, and in less than four years the church was completed with the exception of the portico – which, however, was built at the expense of the Archbishop of Embrun, then Ambassador at Madrid, who having recovered from a dangerous sickness in consequence of a vow made to Notre Dame du Laus, wished to make this portico his thank-offering.
Although the erection of this magnificent church on a spot so humble seemed in itself to confirm the truth of the revelation made to Benoîte, the success of her work only increased the number and malice of her enemies. After the death of M. Lambert, which took place very soon after the consecration of the church, certain members of the chapter of Embrun revived all the old accusations against the shepherdess of Laus. They caused a paper to be affixed to the church door, threatening with excommunication any priest who dared to offer Mass there, or any lay person who received the Sacraments within its walls. It is needless to say that an interdict of such a character, and from such an authority, was altogether unlawful – neither did those who published it ever dare to carry its threats into effect.
A new Vicar-General was soon appointed who summoned Benoîte to Embrun, and subjected her to a second examination, which terminated in his declaring that the pilgrimage of Notre Dame du Laus was the work of God, and that the innocence and sanctity of Benoîte were above suspicion. The newly appointed Archbishop, Monseigneur de Genlis, even visited Laus in person, and on beholding the church crowded with its devout worshipers, exclaimed aloud, Vere Dominus est in loco isto (Truly the Lord is in this place!) He also questioned Benoîte closely, and wrote down her answers with his own hand, declaring afterwards that he had never witnessed more simple or more solid piety.
ConversionsIn fact, the reputation for sanctity which the shepherdess of Laus enjoys does not by any means rest merely on the apparitions with which she was favored. Her devotion to Jesus and His Holy Mother was not alone evinced by prayers and ecstasies, but by the far surer tokens of humility, disinterestedness, charity, and forgiveness of injuries. The work to which she devoted herself was to labor by prayer and severe austerities for the conversion of sinners. This idea had never left her soul since she had one day been granted a vision of her Divine Lord hanging on the Cross: this then was what He had suffered for sinners, and this was the love He bore them! Such were the thoughts which the piteous spectacle engraved on the heart of Benoîte, and from that hour her sole desire was to suffer and to love with Him.
She often prolonged her fasts for many days, and observed a continual abstinence, living only on bread and a little fruit. She watched the greater part of every night, and only slept on the bare ground. Thrice a week for the space of thirty years she went barefoot to that spot on the road between Laus and Avançon, where the vision above spoken of had appeared to her, and spent many hours there, weeping and praying for the conversion of sinners, and all the rest of her time she devoted herself to the service of the pilgrims. Many were the souls who owed their lasting conversion to her charitable exhortations, and not a few have borne witness to the marvelous gift which she possessed of penetrating into the secrets of their consciences. Of her other mortifications, in the shape of hair-cloths, disciplines, chains, and endurance of excessive cold, we will only add, that she was at last warned by Our Lady to moderate their excess, and that, by the testimony of all who knew her, she made her life one long-continued martyrdom.
Far from dying out at the end of a dozen years, as M. Lambert had expected, the devotion to Notre Dame du Laus constantly assumed larger proportions. At the suggestion of Benoîte, regular retreats were established eight times a year, which were conducted according to fixed rules, and were the means of effecting a great revival of solid piety. And what is more, this religious movement of which Laus had become the center, survived more than one crisis which threatened the entire destruction of the new Sanctuary. In 1692 the troops of the Duke of Savoy entered Dauphiny, and laid siege to Embrun. Benoîte with many of here fellow-villagers took refuge at Marseilles, whilst the hostile forces overran the country, pillaged the church of Laus, and destroyed whatever they were not able to carry off. When she was at length able to return to her native valley, the servant of God was profoundly afflicted at beholding the profanation which had been offered to the Sanctuary. The house of the priests had been burnt, and the marble altars dashed to pieces; everything was in ruins and desolation, but Benoîte did not lose heart. We have more than we had twenty-eight years ago, she said, and she at once set about the work of restoration. Once again this was accomplished with the pence of the poor; no rich benefactors came forward; but one village contributed wood, another stone, a third wagons and horses. Benoîte herself directed and encouraged their labors, and in a few months' time the church of Laus presented even a better appearance than it had done before the invasion.
A more serious danger menaced the prosperity of Laus, when, on the death of the priests who had up to that time served the Sanctuary, others were appointed of Jansenistic principles, who no sooner found themselves in possession of the place than they used every effort to put a stop to the pilgrimage. They caused all the oratories erected in the different localities of Laus to be destroyed, they drove away the pilgrims, and publicly preached from the pulpit against the popular devotion exhibited towards Our Lady; and not only did they forbid Benoîte to discharge her accustomed offices in the holy chapel – the altar and linen of which she had hitherto had charge of – but they refused to admit her to the Sacraments, put her in a sort of confinement, and only allowed her to hear Mass once a week. This persecution lasted for twenty years, during all of which time Benoîte submitted to their injurious treatment with her usual docility and resignation; the only order which she refused to obey, was that she should use her influence with the people to deter them from resorting to Laus, for this would have been, as she considered, a direct disobedience to the Divine commands. Her only weapons of defense were prayer and confidence, and they did not fail to effect her deliverance. In 1712 the Archbishop of Embrun removed the priests of Laus, and confided the care of the Sanctuary to a congregation of missionaries, knows as that of Notre Dame de Sainte-Garde, and no sooner was the change effected than everything returned into its former channel; the pilgrimage became more frequented than ever, and the fruit of souls more marvelous and abundant. Benoîte, who had lived to see this happy fulfillment of her prayers and ardent desires, understood that her work was ended, and that she had nothing more to do but to prepare for death. She expired on the Feast of the Holy Innocents, 1718, at the age of seventy-one years, fifty-six of which had been spent in founding and supporting the Sanctuary which seemed to have been entrusted to her guardianship by the Mother of God.
Death of BenoiteHer body lies buried in front of the high altar of Laus, and is covered with a stone, bearing the following inscription:

Tombeau de la Sœur Benoîte, Morte en odeur de sainteté Le 28 dècembre 1718.
Tomb of Sister Benoite, Died in the odor of sanctity December 28, 1718.

The title of Sister is here bestowed on her, in consequence of her having been associated to the Third Order of St. Dominic. Eighty years later the tomb was opened and the body was discovered perfectly incorrupt. The voice of the people has long since expressed their pious conviction of her heroic sanctity, and it is understood that the necessary documents have been drawn up by the ecclesiastical authorities with the view of introducing the process of her beatification at Rome.


The devotion of the people in no degree slackened after the death of Benoîte. The missionaries continued their pious labors, and pilgrims continued to resort to Laus in great numbers up to the year 1791, when the revolution came once more to lay waste the holy sanctuary. The priests were driven away, all the ornaments of the church seized, the church itself shut up, and the houses for the use of the pilgrims either burnt or sold. Frightful sacrileges were perpetrated by the brutal ruffians who carried out the orders of their masters, and who destroyed and desecrated whatever they were unable to carry off. They were directed to efface every memorial of piety in the neighborhood, to demolish all the crosses and oratories in the surrounding valleys, and to purge the country of their odious presence, and these orders they carried out to the letter. But they were unable to destroy the devotion which had struck its roots into the hearts of the people. All through the miserable days of the Reign of Terror, the peasants continued to resort to their ruined and desolate sanctuary, to bring thither their sick, and to invoke the aid of the Mother of God in all their tribulations. On occasion of a great drought which threatened to destroy all hope of a harvest, the surrounding villages even insisted on making a solemn public procession to Laus, as in former times, and their faith was rewarded by a fall of rain, which restored their lands to fertility.
At last, when order was restored, in 1802, Msgr. Miollis, Bishop of Digne, purchased and restored the church, and reopened it for public worship. Three of the surviving missionaries returned to their old post, and at once the devotion of the people, forcibly restrained for a time, broke forth with a greater enthusiasm than ever. Ocular witnesses have described the scenes they themselves witnessed in 1804, when the entire church was blocked up by the crowds of penitents, and the priests in attendance were found insufficient to satisfy the requirements of the pilgrims. In course of time a new congregation of missionary priests was established at Laus, the retreats and other pious exercises were revived, and oratories and chapels erected on the site of those destroyed by the revolutionaries. Eventually Notre Dame du Laus probably attracted a greater number of pilgrims than even during the days of Benoîte, and it was no uncommon thing on the greater feasts to see altars erected out of doors for the celebration of Mass, in order to accommodate the vast crowds that overflowed the spacious church. The average number of those who visited Laus in the course of the year was 80,000, of which the greater proportion attended at the Feast of Pentecost, and during the October retreat. On those occasions as many as thirty-six or even forty priests were to be seen attending in the confessionals, where they often had to remain during the entire night. Many extraordinary graces have been received at these times, of which testimony is to be found in the ex-voto offerings which cover the walls.
Cross VisionThe visitor to Laus would find the memory of Benoîte still fresh in the breasts of the people, and all the surrounding valleys filled with pious monuments attesting their faith in those apparitions which were vouchsafed to her by the Mother of God. The grotto where the little shepherdess was accustomed to pray, the rock where Our Lady first appeared to her, the chapel of Notre Dame d’Erable, where, according to her history, she had to sustain many assaults from the evil one; another, called the Chapel of the Angel, where her guardian angel is said to have appeared to her in visible form; the Oratory in Pindreau, on the spot where the Blessed Virgin first directed her to go to Laus, and finally, that of the Cross, on the road where she beheld the Vision of Jesus Crucified (image right) – all these and more are numbered among the holy places of Laus. Swept away once by war, and again by anti-religious revolution, they have each time been restored, and not merely the material buildings have reap-peared, but with them the faith, the devotion, the indescribable atmosphere of piety which seems to hang about this celebrated place of pilgrimage.
At the close of one of the retreats, one of those who had assisted at its exercises exclaimed with great emotion, Why do they not preach like this in our parish?! One of the missionaries who overheard him replied, In your parish, very probably they preach not only as well, but a great deal better than they do here; only here, there is an Invisible Preacher, Who speaks to the heart.And these few words contain the secret of that wonderful influence which is felt by those who visit holy sanctuaries in the true spirit of pilgrimage. God makes Himself felt there as the Invisible Preacher; He draws souls to these His secret places, that He may speak to their hearts, and the long list of miraculous cures and graces which fill the chronicles of such sanctuaries are but a feeble exterior token of far more numerous and prodigious graces granted invisibly to penitent and believing souls.